case regulation Case legislation is regulation that is based on judicial decisions instead than law based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case legislation concerns unique disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case law, also used interchangeably with common legislation , refers to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions with a particular issue or subject matter.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It really is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Today tutorial writers are frequently cited in legal argument and decisions as persuasive authority; often, They're cited when judges are attempting to employ reasoning that other courts have not still adopted, or when the judge believes the educational's restatement of the law is more powerful than is often found in case regulation. So common regulation systems are adopting one of many methods long-held in civil law jurisdictions.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner together with private respondents and will choose care of the many elements of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is on the market in specific limited situations, it truly is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.
However it really is made distinct that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also guarantee regard of the family drop in accordance with regulation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security from the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. nine. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is realized. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Work with DCFS.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and also the case shall be decided because of the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The acquired Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, check here without being influenced by the findings inside the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of your respective parties. Read more